Bomb Disposal Expert Claims Mail Bombs Sent To Democratic Leaders Are an ‘Obvious Hoax’

Share This Article

The mail bombs sent to CNN and Democratic leaders such as Barack Obama and Hillary and also  George sorros is an “obvious hoax” according to a bomb disposal expert who argues the stunt was clearly designed for maximum political impact, not maximum damage.

The timing is “suspicious” given the proximity to the mid-term elections in wich Republicans are highly favored.

Tom Sauer, a former Navy bomb disposal expert, has analyzed the evidence presented by CNN and declared that the “pipe bomb” are obvious fakes, and whoever made the bomb wanted it to be “painfully obvious to anyone and everyone that it’s a ‘bomb.’”

As a Navy Explosive Ordnance Disposal technician, Tom Sauer was responsible for conducting the demolition of hazardous munitions, pyrotechnics, and retrograde explosives using detonation and burning techniques. It’s safe to say he knows what a pipe bomb looks like.

By the sounds of it, Tom Sauer also recognizes a “silly looking” prop from a media propaganda campaign designed to influence a midterm election when he sees one.

“In which case, we should ask ourselves what the motives of the “bomber” are and “who benefits?”

Photo of one of the “bombs” featured by CNN:

“Go ahead. Think deeply and critically.”

As Tom Sauer asks, who benefits from fake bombs being sent to former Democratic leaders and CNN? That is the million dollar question here.

A former law enforcement officer also said it is clear the mail bomb story is “propaganda” designed to influence an election.

Investigative journalist Adam Housley spoke to federal agents who said the fact that none of the bombs detonated is highly significant.

HOUSLEY: Federal agents say they are working on the theory that it’s one group, or one person. Also…the fact that none of them detonated is more significant than people may realize. I am told that’s a “huge clue”.

HOUSLEY: Also being investigated is whether all the packages came from expedited carriers.

Is this a dry run? Distraction? A few examples of theories feds are talking about.

Not insinuating this is a false flag, just asking questions journalists are supposed to ask.

Investigative reporter, Paul Sperry said it best:

Did you like this?
Tip TheTruthRevolution with Cryptocurrency

Donate Bitcoin to TheTruthRevolution

Scan to Donate Bitcoin to TheTruthRevolution
Scan the QR code or copy the address below into your wallet to send some bitcoin:

Donate Bitcoin Cash to TheTruthRevolution

Scan to Donate Bitcoin Cash to TheTruthRevolution
Scan the QR code or copy the address below into your wallet to send bitcoin:

Donate Ethereum to TheTruthRevolution

Scan to Donate Ethereum to TheTruthRevolution
Scan the QR code or copy the address below into your wallet to send some Ether:

Donate Litecoin to TheTruthRevolution

Scan to Donate Litecoin to TheTruthRevolution
Scan the QR code or copy the address below into your wallet to send some Litecoin:

Donate Monero to TheTruthRevolution

Scan to Donate Monero to TheTruthRevolution
Scan the QR code or copy the address below into your wallet to send some Monero:

Donate ZCash to TheTruthRevolution

Scan to Donate ZCash to TheTruthRevolution
Scan the QR code or copy the address below into your wallet to send some ZCash: